America's Health Rankings, United Health Foundation Logo
Rankings included in this year’s Senior Report are derived from 35 measures across five categories of health: social and economic factors, physical environment, behaviors, clinical care and health outcomes. For a more detailed description of how the overall rank is calculated, visit the America’s Health Rankings Methodology page.

Utah Ranks No. 1

Utah is the healthiest state for older adults. It ranks in the top quintile across social and economic factors (No. 1), clinical care (No. 9), behaviors (No. 3) and health outcomes (No. 9).
Strengths: Low poverty rate, high volunteerism rate and high hospice care use.
Challenges: High suicide rate, low geriatric provider rate and low percentage of older adults with a dedicated health care provider.
The five healthiest states for older adults are Utah, New Hampshire, Colorado, Minnesota and Vermont.

Mississippi Ranks No. 50

Mississippi is the least healthy state for older adults. It ranks in the bottom quintile across all model categories: social and economic factors (No. 50), physical environment (No. 42), clinical care (No. 49), behaviors (No. 47) and health outcomes (No. 43).
Strengths: Low prevalence of frequent mental distress, low prevalence of excessive drinking and low prevalence of severe housing problems.
Challenges: High early death rate, high poverty rate and high prevalence of food insecurity.
The five states with the most room to improve are Mississippi, Louisiana, Kentucky, West Virginia and Oklahoma.
Graphic representation of 2023 Senior Report State Rankings contained on this page. Download the full report PDF from the report Overview page for details.

Measure Impact

Graphic representation of 2023 Senior Report State Rankings and Scores information contained on this page. Download the full report PDF from the report Overview page for details.
This graph displays the state scores in order of rank from healthiest to least healthy. The difference between the lengths of the bars indicates the difference between state scores. For example, Oklahoma (No. 46) and West Virginia (No. 47) have a large difference in score, making it more of a challenge for West Virginia to move up in the rankings. There is also a large gap in score between Nevada (No. 43) and Arkansas (No. 44).
To further explore state-level data, see Explore Data. The website features downloadable State Summaries for each state as well as the District of Columbia. Each summary describes state-specific strengths, challenges, trends and rankings for individual measures, allowing users to identify which measures positively or negatively influenced their state’s overall rank. This can be visualized by selecting a state in the Explore Data section. The website also features an Adjust My Rank tool that allows users to explore how progress and challenges across key measures can impact a state’s overall rank.