America's Health Rankings, United Health Foundation Logo

Household Smoke - Children in Nevada
search
Nevada
search

Explore national- and state-level data for hundreds of health, environmental and socioeconomic measures, including background information about each measure. Use features on this page to find measures; view subpopulations, trends and rankings; and download and share content.

Nevada Value:

12.3%

Percentage of children ages 0-17 who live in households where someone uses cigarettes, cigars or pipe tobacco (2-year estimate)

Nevada Rank:

24

Household Smoke - Children in depth:

Explore Population Data:

Household Smoke - Children by State

Percentage of children ages 0-17 who live in households where someone uses cigarettes, cigars or pipe tobacco (2-year estimate)

Search by State
Search for a state or tap below

Household Smoke - Children in

Data from National Survey of Children's Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), Maternal and Child Health Bureau (MCHB), 2022-2023

<= 9.8%

9.9% - 11.3%

11.4% - 13.7%

13.8% - 15.0%

>= 15.1%

• Data Unavailable
Top StatesRankValue
Your StateRankValue
Bottom StatesRankValue
4818.1%
4921.9%

Household Smoke - Children

15.3%
89.3%
109.8%
1110.0%
1210.1%
1310.5%
1410.6%
1511.0%
1611.1%
1611.1%
1611.1%
1611.1%
2011.3%
2111.6%
2312.2%
2412.3%
2612.7%
3013.7%
3013.7%
3313.8%
3413.9%
3514.0%
3614.6%
3614.6%
3814.9%
3915.0%
4115.2%
4316.2%
4416.6%
4416.6%
4616.7%
4716.9%
4818.1%
4921.9%
Data Unavailable
Source:
  • National Survey of Children's Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), Maternal and Child Health Bureau (MCHB), 2022-2023

Household Smoke - Children Trends

Percentage of children ages 0-17 who live in households where someone uses cigarettes, cigars or pipe tobacco (2-year estimate)

Compare States
plus

About Household Smoke - Children

US Value: 11.5%

Top State(s): Utah: 5.3%

Bottom State(s): West Virginia: 24.9%

Definition: Percentage of children ages 0-17 who live in households where someone uses cigarettes, cigars or pipe tobacco (2-year estimate)

Data Source and Years(s): National Survey of Children's Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), Maternal and Child Health Bureau (MCHB), 2022-2023

Suggested Citation: America's Health Rankings analysis of National Survey of Children's Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), Maternal and Child Health Bureau (MCHB), United Health Foundation, AmericasHealthRankings.org, accessed 2024.

The adverse impact of environmental tobacco smoke, or secondhand smoke, on children’s health is widely documented and recognized. While exposure to secondhand smoke is bad for everyone, it is especially harmful to infants and children, whose bodies are still growing and developing.

Secondhand smoke exposure is associated with numerous health problems in children, including: 

  • Sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS).
  • Respiratory infections, like pneumonia and bronchitis.
  • More frequent and severe asthma attacks.
  • Slower lung development.
  • Premature death and disease from exposure to cancer-causing chemicals.
  • Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms.

Among children, exposure to secondhand smoke is associated with an increase in emergency department visits and overnight hospital stays. Children with asthma who are exposed to secondhand smoke have more frequent and severe reactions that result in more emergency visits. The estimated economic burden of secondhand smoke among children ages 3-14, measured in emergency department-related costs, was $62.9 million in 2010.

According to data from the National Survey of Children’s Health, the percentage of children living in households where someone smokes is higher among:

Most secondhand smoke exposure among children happens at home; therefore, many intervention strategies focus on the home environment. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development banned smoking in all public housing in 2017, with one study estimating the potential savings at $154 million annually. Prohibiting smoking in all government-subsidized housing would not only protect more nonsmokers from secondhand smoke exposure in their homes, but could also save an additional $360 million in annual smoking-related societal costs.

The Community Preventive Services Task Force recommends smoke-free policies to protect non-smokers from involuntary exposure to secondhand smoke and reduce tobacco use among smokers. Recent legislation has greatly decreased the amount of secondhand smoke that nonsmokers are exposed to and these broad policy interventions are tied to improvements in markers of population health. Further, smoke-free housing can promote healthier living environments. Encouraging property managers and landlords to enforce smoke-free policies in multi-unit housing can help protect other residents, particularly vulnerable populations like children, from secondhand smoke exposure. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, implementing smoke-free laws may stimulate voluntary smoke-free homes and smoke-free rules for private vehicles. Therefore, such laws could help create healthier home environments for children.

Healthy People 2030 has multiple objectives towards reducing the number of people exposed to secondhand smoke, including: 

  • Increasing the proportion of smoke-free homes.
  • Reducing the proportion of people who don’t smoke but are exposed to secondhand smoke.
  • Increasing successful quit attempts in adults who smoke.

Hahn, Ellen J. “Smokefree Legislation: A Review of Health and Economic Outcomes Research.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine 39, no. 6 Suppl 1 (December 2010): S66-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2010.08.013.

King, Brian A., Richard M. Peck, and Stephen D. Babb. “Cost Savings Associated with Prohibiting Smoking in U.S. Subsidized Housing.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine 44, no. 6 (June 2013): 631–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2013.01.024.

Lin, Li-Zi, Shu-Li Xu, Qi-Zhen Wu, Yang Zhou, Hui-Min Ma, Duo-Hong Chen, Gong-Bo Chen, et al. “Association of Prenatal, Early Postnatal, or Current Exposure to Secondhand Smoke With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Symptoms in Children.” JAMA Network Open 4, no. 5 (May 20, 2021): e2110931. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.10931.

Merianos, Ashley L., Roman A. Jandarov, and E. Melinda Mahabee-Gittens. “Secondhand Smoke Exposure and Pediatric Healthcare Visits and Hospitalizations.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine 53, no. 4 (October 2017): 441–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2017.03.020.

Research & Evaluation Group at Public Health Management Corporation. “Smokefree Multi-Unit Housing: American Lung Association Progress Leading up to Implementation of the HUD Ruling.” American Lung Association, March 2019. https://www.lung.org/getmedia/79b32278-68a6-4e90-9fe4-d601eba397ce/smokefree-multi-unit-housing.pdf.pdf.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. “Children and Secondhand Smoke Exposure: Excerpts from The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke: A Report of the Surgeon General.” Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Coordinating Center for Health Promotion, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, 2007. CDC:5173. https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/5173.

Yao, Tingting, Hai-Yen Sung, Yingning Wang, James Lightwood, and Wendy Max. “Healthcare Costs of Secondhand Smoke Exposure at Home for U.S. Children.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine 56, no. 2 (February 2019): 281–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2018.08.013.

Current Reports

America’s Health Rankings builds on the work of the United Health Foundation to draw attention to public health and better understand the health of various populations. Our platform provides relevant information that policymakers, public health officials, advocates and leaders can use to effect change in their communities.

We have developed detailed analyses on the health of key populations in the country, including women and children, seniors and those who have served in the U.S. Armed Forces, in addition to a deep dive into health disparities across the country.