Explore national- and state-level data for hundreds of health, environmental and socioeconomic measures, including background information about each measure. Use features on this page to find measures; view subpopulations, trends and rankings; and download and share content.
Montana Value:
Percentage of households with a broadband internet subscription and a computer, smartphone or tablet
Montana Rank:
Additional Measures:
Explore Population Data:
Appears In:
Percentage of households with a broadband internet subscription and a computer, smartphone or tablet
>= 94.3%
93.1% - 94.2%
92.4% - 93.0%
91.5% - 92.3%
<= 91.4%
US Value: 92.9%
Top State(s): New Hampshire: 95.4%
Bottom State(s): Mississippi: 87.7%
Definition: Percentage of households with a broadband internet subscription and a computer, smartphone or tablet
Data Source and Years(s): U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2022
Suggested Citation: America's Health Rankings analysis of U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, United Health Foundation, AmericasHealthRankings.org, accessed 2024.
High-speed internet, also known as broadband internet, is an important resource for work, education and efficient communication. Access to the internet is a human right according to the United Nations, citing the internet’s importance for social and economic development. Researchers have also recently identified access to high-speed internet as a social determinant of health. It was especially crucial during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, as many employers and educators transitioned to remote work and learning. Having high-speed internet is also vital for receiving health care via telehealth.
Despite its necessity, there are barriers to high-speed internet access, including cost and insufficient infrastructure. Lack of access to high-speed internet can restrict access to basic government services, educational and economic opportunities, accessible health care through telemedicine and avenues for social connectedness.
The prevalence of high-speed internet is higher among:
Lack of access to education and telehealth services caused by the lack of high-speed internet disproportionately affected rural communities and racial/ethnic minority populations.
The biggest barriers to accessing high-speed internet at home are cost and lack of digital skills. State policies and strategies that improve broadband internet access include:
Households eligible for the Affordable Connectivity Program can receive discounted or no-cost high-speed internet. Individuals can see the program's eligibility requirements and apply online.
The ACCESS BROADBAND dashboard is a useful tool to understand the economic effects of broadband infrastructure expansion. This interactive tool includes a map that displays access measures and economic characteristics that can be influenced with greater broadband access. The map provides income, home value, educational attainment and GDP statistics so users can grasp the economic context of the areas in which broadband investment efforts occur.
Healthy People 2030 has a goal to increase the proportion of adults with broadband internet access.
Anderson, Monica. “Mobile Technology and Home Broadband 2019.” Pew Research Center, June 13, 2019. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2019/06/13/mobile-technology-and-home-broadband-2019/.
Bauerly, Brittney Crock, Russell F. McCord, Rachel Hulkower, and Dawn Pepin. “Broadband Access as a Public Health Issue: The Role of Law in Expanding Broadband Access and Connecting Underserved Communities for Better Health Outcomes.” The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 47, no. S2 (June 2019): 39–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073110519857314.
Gajarawala, Shilpa N., and Jessica N. Pelkowski. “Telehealth Benefits and Barriers.” The Journal for Nurse Practitioners 17, no. 2 (February 2021): 218–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nurpra.2020.09.013.
Graves, Janessa M., Demetrius A. Abshire, Solmaz Amiri, and Jessica L. Mackelprang. “Disparities in Technology and Broadband Internet Access across Rurality: Implications for Health and Education.” Family & Community Health 44, no. 4 (2021): 257–65. https://doi.org/10.1097/FCH.0000000000000306.
Julien, Howard M., Lauren A. Eberly, and Srinath Adusumalli. “Telemedicine and the Forgotten America.” Circulation 142, no. 4 (July 28, 2020): 312–14. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.048535.
McClain, Colleen, Emily A. Vogels, Andrew Perrin, Stella Sechopoulos, and Lee Rainie. “The Internet and the Pandemic.” Pew Research Center, September 1, 2021. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2021/09/01/the-internet-and-the-pandemic/.
Nowland, Rebecca, Elizabeth A. Necka, and John T. Cacioppo. “Loneliness and Social Internet Use: Pathways to Reconnection in a Digital World?” Perspectives on Psychological Science 13, no. 1 (January 2018): 70–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617713052.
America’s Health Rankings builds on the work of the United Health Foundation to draw attention to public health and better understand the health of various populations. Our platform provides relevant information that policymakers, public health officials, advocates and leaders can use to effect change in their communities.
We have developed detailed analyses on the health of key populations in the country, including women and children, seniors and those who have served in the U.S. Armed Forces, in addition to a deep dive into health disparities across the country.