America's Health Rankings, United Health Foundation Logo

Drive Alone to Work in Connecticut
search
Connecticut
search

Explore national- and state-level data for hundreds of health, environmental and socioeconomic measures, including background information about each measure. Use features on this page to find measures; view subpopulations, trends and rankings; and download and share content.

Connecticut Value:

69.0%

Percentage of workers age 16 and older who drive alone to work

Connecticut Rank:

16

Drive Alone to Work in depth:

Additional Measures:

Explore Population Data:

Appears In:

Drive Alone to Work by State

Percentage of workers age 16 and older who drive alone to work

Search by State
Search for a state or tap below

Data from U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2022

<= 65.5%

65.6% - 69.8%

69.9% - 73.3%

73.4% - 76.2%

>= 76.3%

• Data Unavailable
Top StatesRankValue
Your StateRankValue
Bottom StatesRankValue
4879.8%
4980.5%

Drive Alone to Work

149.0%
564.1%
564.1%
764.2%
864.7%
965.1%
1065.5%
1166.1%
1166.1%
1367.4%
1467.9%
1769.3%
1869.4%
1969.7%
2069.8%
2170.0%
2170.0%
2370.5%
2571.2%
2772.4%
2972.8%
3073.3%
3173.9%
3274.0%
3374.8%
3475.0%
3575.3%
3675.4%
3775.7%
3876.0%
3976.1%
4076.2%
4276.5%
4377.8%
4578.5%
4879.8%
4980.5%
Data Unavailable
Source:
  • U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2022

Drive Alone to Work Trends

Percentage of workers age 16 and older who drive alone to work

Compare States
plus

About Drive Alone to Work

US Value: 68.7%

Top State(s): New York: 49.0%

Bottom State(s): Mississippi: 81.9%

Definition: Percentage of workers age 16 and older who drive alone to work

Data Source and Years(s): U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2022

Suggested Citation: America's Health Rankings analysis of U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, United Health Foundation, AmericasHealthRankings.org, accessed 2024.

Commuting is a daily necessity for many people and driving alone is by far the most common mode of transportation to work. There are environmental and individual health concerns associated with driving: driving alone to work involves extended periods of social isolation and physical inactivity, and more motor vehicles on the road means more air pollution, noise pollution and transportation congestion. Congestion, a common occurrence in large cities, creates concentrated areas of air and noise pollution, which disproportionately affect those with lower socioeconomic status. Commutes greater than 15 miles can also increase the risk of high blood pressure, obesity and physical inactivity.

After housing expenses, vehicle maintenance (including purchasing, upkeep, and operation) represents the second-largest expenditure for households. By utilizing public transportation and reducing the number of owned vehicles by one, a household can save $13,000. Additionally, switching from driving alone to public transportation can reduce an individual's CO2 emissions by 20 pounds per day, more than 48,000 pounds per year.

According to America’s Health Rankings data, the prevalence of driving alone to work is higher among males compared with females. Other populations that spend more time driving alone to work include:

  • White workers compared with Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, American Indian/Alaska Native and Asian workers.
  • Workers ages 25 to 44.
  • Workers born in the U.S. compared with those who are foreign-born.
  • Workers with an income at or above 150% of the poverty level compared with workers with lower incomes.

Strategies to promote modes of transportation other than driving, particularly driving alone, include:

Healthy People 2030 has multiple objectives related to transportation, including:

  • Increasing the trips to work made by mass transit. 
  • Increasing the proportion of adults who walk or bike to get places.

Abrams, Zara. “The Future of Remote Work.” Monitor on Psychology 50, no. 9 (October 1, 2019). https://www.apa.org/monitor/2019/10/cover-remote-work.

Giles-Corti, Billie, Anne Vernez-Moudon, Rodrigo Reis, Gavin Turrell, Andrew L. Dannenberg, Hannah Badland, Sarah Foster, et al. “City Planning and Population Health: A Global Challenge.” The Lancet 388, no. 10062 (December 2016): 2912–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30066-6.

Hoehner, Christine M., Carolyn E. Barlow, Peg Allen, and Mario Schootman. “Commuting Distance, Cardiorespiratory Fitness, and Metabolic Risk.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine 42, no. 6 (June 2012): 571–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2012.02.020.

Nieuwenhuijsen, Mark J. “Urban and Transport Planning, Environmental Exposures and Health-New Concepts, Methods and Tools to Improve Health in Cities.” Environmental Health 15 (December 2016): S38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-016-0108-1.

van Schalkwyk, M. C. I., and J. S. Mindell. “Current Issues in the Impacts of Transport on Health.” British Medical Bulletin 125, no. 1 (March 1, 2018): 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldx048.

Current Reports

America’s Health Rankings builds on the work of the United Health Foundation to draw attention to public health and better understand the health of various populations. Our platform provides relevant information that policymakers, public health officials, advocates and leaders can use to effect change in their communities.

We have developed detailed analyses on the health of key populations in the country, including women and children, seniors and those who have served in the U.S. Armed Forces, in addition to a deep dive into health disparities across the country.