Explore national- and state-level data for hundreds of health, environmental and socioeconomic measures, including background information about each measure. Use features on this page to find measures; view subpopulations, trends and rankings; and download and share content.
Mississippi Value:
Percentage of women ages 18-44 who reported having a personal doctor or health care provider
Mississippi Rank:
Additional Measures:
Explore Population Data:
Appears In:
Percentage of women ages 18-44 who reported having a personal doctor or health care provider
>= 84.7%
82.0% - 84.6%
79.8% - 81.9%
76.2% - 79.7%
<= 76.1%
US Value: 78.1%
Top State(s): Maine: 91.0%
Bottom State(s): Texas: 66.4%
Definition: Percentage of women ages 18-44 who reported having a personal doctor or health care provider
Data Source and Years(s): CDC, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2021-2022
Suggested Citation: America's Health Rankings analysis of CDC, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, United Health Foundation, AmericasHealthRankings.org, accessed 2024.
Individuals with a dedicated health care provider are better positioned to receive care that can prevent, detect and manage disease and other health conditions. Having a regular health care provider helps the patient and provider build a stable, long-term relationship that is associated with several benefits, including:
A regular provider can help with care coordination and continuity, particularly for women, who often rely on at least two providers for routine care: obstetricians or gynecologists for reproductive care and primary care providers for general health care.
Populations of women more likely to report seeing a regular clinician for care include:
Strategies to increase the number of women with a dedicated health care provider include:
Increasing the proportion of people with a usual primary care provider is a Healthy People 2030 leading health indicator.
Bodenheimer, Thomas S., and Mark D. Smith. “Primary Care: Proposed Solutions To The Physician Shortage Without Training More Physicians.” Health Affairs 32, no. 11 (November 1, 2013): 1881–86. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0234.
Friedberg, Mark W., Peter S. Hussey, and Eric C. Schneider. “Primary Care: A Critical Review Of The Evidence On Quality And Costs Of Health Care.” Health Affairs 29, no. 5 (May 1, 2010): 766–72. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0025.
Salganicoff, Alina, Usha Ranji, Adara Beamesderfer, and Nisha Kurani. “Women and Health Care in the Early Years of the Affordable Care Act: Key Findings from the 2013 Kaiser Women’s Health Survey.” Issue Brief. KFF, May 15, 2014. https://www.kff.org/womens-health-policy/report/women-and-health-care-in-the-early-years-of-the-aca-key-findings-from-the-2013-kaiser-womens-health-survey/.
Winters, Paul, Daniel Tancredi, and Kevin Fiscella. “The Role of Usual Source of Care in Cholesterol Treatment.” The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine 23, no. 2 (March 1, 2010): 179–85. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2010.02.090084.
America’s Health Rankings builds on the work of the United Health Foundation to draw attention to public health and better understand the health of various populations. Our platform provides relevant information that policymakers, public health officials, advocates and leaders can use to effect change in their communities.
We have developed detailed analyses on the health of key populations in the country, including women and children, seniors and those who have served in the U.S. Armed Forces, in addition to a deep dive into health disparities across the country.