Explore national- and state-level data for hundreds of health, environmental and socioeconomic measures, including background information about each measure. Use features on this page to find measures; view subpopulations, trends and rankings; and download and share content.
South Dakota Value:
Dollars captured by the Administration on Aging per adult age 60 and older
South Dakota Rank:
Explore Population Data:
Appears In:
Dollars captured by the Administration on Aging per adult age 60 and older
>= $85
$50 - $84
$37 - $49
$30 - $36
<= $29
US Value: $62
Top State(s): Massachusetts: $272
Bottom State(s): South Carolina: $17
Definition: Dollars captured by the Administration on Aging per adult age 60 and older
Data Source and Years(s): U.S. HHS, Administration for Community Living, State Program Reports, 2021
Suggested Citation: America's Health Rankings analysis of U.S. HHS, Administration for Community Living, State Program Reports, United Health Foundation, AmericasHealthRankings.org, accessed 2024.
Most older adults value living in their own home safely and independently. Several federal and state programs offer older adults support in remaining independent at home, which ultimately saves money for both older adults and the federal programs that help fund nursing home care.
Since the Older Americans Act (OAA) of 1965, the Administration on Aging has provided funding to states for community, social and nutritional services that assist adults age 60 and older and their caregivers. The funding is used by states for programs supporting transportation, personal care, adult day care, homemaker assistance, case management, home-delivered meals, congregate meals, physical fitness and nutrition education.
These funds are targeted toward adults age 60 and older with an emphasis on those with greatest social and economic need, such as low-income older adults, racial and ethnic minorities, older adults living in rural communities and those at risk of institutional care. The Administration on Aging provided services to 1 in 7 older adults in 2018.
While the community support measure in this report is limited to OAA dollars, other state and federal funding exists to support older adults. In fiscal year 2020, $124.6 billion, or 62.5%, of all Medicaid long-term services and support spending went toward home- and community-based services such as home health aides, adult day care, meal programs, in-home modifications and assistive equipment.
Of the 10.8 million individuals served by OAA support programs in 2018:
OAA programs also serve a disproportionate amount of older individuals who live alone, which is a risk factor for nursing home admission and social isolation.
Investment in social services for older adults may help them maintain function and independence. A 2013 study found that increases in home- and community-based services for older adults, such as home-delivered meals, congregate meals or community centers, were associated with a decrease in the proportion of low-care residents in nursing homes.
Further research published in 2017 found that Medicaid waivers for home- and community-based services lower the risk of long-term nursing home admissions, enabling older adults to engage in their communities and live in their own homes.
Results from the 2022 National Survey of OAA Participants spoke to the effectiveness of community support services — 80% of congregate meals clients and 89% of home-delivered meals clients reported that these services helped them continue to live independently at home.
To learn about the programs and services funded in your community, visit the Administration on Aging’s Eldercare Locator.
Administration on Aging, and Administration for Community Living. “FY 2018 Older Americans Act Report to Congress.” U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, June 2021. https://acl.gov/sites/default/files/about-acl/2021-06/ACL_FY2018%20OAA%20Report%20to%20Congress.pdf.
Klinenberg, Eric. “Social Isolation, Loneliness, and Living Alone: Identifying the Risks for Public Health.” American Journal of Public Health 106, no. 5 (May 2016): 786–87. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303166.
Murray, Caitlin, Michelle Eckstein, Debra Lipson, and Andrea Wysocki. “Medicaid Long Term Services and Supports Annual Expenditures Report: Federal Fiscal Year 2020.” Chicago, IL: Mathematica, June 9, 2023. https://www.medicaid.gov/sites/default/files/2023-10/ltssexpenditures2020.pdf.
Segelman, Micah, Orna Intrator, Yue Li, Dana Mukamel, Peter Veazie, and Helena Temkin-Greener. “HCBS Spending and Nursing Home Admissions for 1915(c) Waiver Enrollees.” Journal of Aging & Social Policy 29, no. 5 (October 20, 2017): 395–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2017.1319714.
Thomas, Kali S., and Vincent Mor. “The Relationship between Older Americans Act Title III State Expenditures and Prevalence of Low-Care Nursing Home Residents.” Health Services Research 48, no. 3 (June 2013): 1215–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12015.
Ujvari, Kathleen, Wendy Fox-Grage, and Ari Houser. “Spotlight: Older Americans Act.” AARP Public Policy Institute, February 2019. https://www.aarp.org/content/dam/aarp/ppi/2019/02/older-americans-act.pdf.
America’s Health Rankings builds on the work of the United Health Foundation to draw attention to public health and better understand the health of various populations. Our platform provides relevant information that policymakers, public health officials, advocates and leaders can use to effect change in their communities.
We have developed detailed analyses on the health of key populations in the country, including women and children, seniors and those who have served in the U.S. Armed Forces, in addition to a deep dive into health disparities across the country.